Stoicism, Death, and the Possibility of Living Forever

Episode #369

The Stoic tradition teaches that death is not to be feared but rather meditated on, accepted, and used as a tool for living virtuously. But what happens when death, once seen as inevitable and natural, becomes optional—perhaps even solvable? As science and technology evolve, the question is no longer purely hypothetical. More voices, like that of entrepreneur Brian Johnson, are challenging death as a technical problem to be overcome. For Stoics, this introduces a fascinating philosophical tension between living in acceptance of fate and maximizing one’s agency.

Death as a Technical Problem

From an engineering perspective, Brandon Tumblin, host of The Strong Stoic podcast, offers a compelling analogy: machines don’t have to die. Replace a part, restore functionality, and the engine continues to run. Similarly, if we view the human body as a machine—comprised of replaceable systems—then perhaps immortality isn’t as fantastical as it seems. This view, however, requires setting aside assumptions about the soul, consciousness, and any divine essence—considering instead a fully materialist conception of life.

If death can be treated like wear and tear, then it becomes a question of technology, not theology. And that opens a philosophical door Stoics would have to walk through carefully.

The Stoic Lens on Immortality

Classic Stoic philosophy places virtue above all else. Living a good life—defined by wisdom, courage, justice, and temperance—matters more than how long that life lasts. Whether you die tomorrow or in a thousand years, your task remains the same: to live well.

This is a crucial distinction. If immortality were achieved, Stoics would not rejoice in eternal life for its own sake. They would ask: How will you use your time? Will you live forever virtuously?

At the same time, death is natural—part of the rhythm of life. But Tumblin points out an interesting twist: if living forever becomes normal, wouldn’t that then be the new natural order? Stoics wouldn’t destroy a rock simply because it exists for a long time. Its continued existence is simply part of what is. If death becomes optional, could life without end become another branch of nature?

Perhaps. But the Stoics would still urge caution.

The Risk of Becoming a Slave to Life

Tumblin explores a darker side of immortality: what if the fear of death becomes so powerful that you become a slave to life? This is not a distant concept—many people today already feel paralyzed by the idea of death. They pursue wealth, power, and distraction as ways to delay or deny it.

Living forever could amplify this fear. If you could extend your life indefinitely, you might never want to die. And so, rather than being free, you become shackled to existence, terrified of its end. Marcus Aurelius wrote that we must always be prepared to leave life. The power of Stoicism lies in its constant awareness of death as a tool for perspective, urgency, and freedom.

Immortality threatens that relationship. Without death as a reference point, purpose can slip away.

Does Death Give Life Meaning?

One of the most enduring philosophical ideas is that death gives life urgency and meaning. The Stoics didn’t believe that meaning required death, but they acknowledged that the awareness of it propels us into action. It is precisely because life is finite that we work, love, build, and strive.

Yet even in a world where death is no longer inevitable, the Stoic message remains: act appropriately. Whether you live 30 years or 3,000, virtue is still your responsibility. Immortality would not be a pass for idleness or indulgence—it would be a test of how well you can live when time is no longer your constraint.

What If You Could Choose When to Die?

Tumblin proposes a deeply Stoic reframe: what if immortality gave us the choice of when to die? Not endless life as an imposition, but the agency to live until we feel complete.

Imagine the natural arc of life: foolish youth, growth, competence, family, wisdom. So many lives are cut short by fate—accidents, illness, randomness. If those tragedies could be prevented, would that not be a Stoic pursuit? Not because we fear death, but because we value well-being and the ability to live a full life.

A Stoic would not demand to live forever, but they might accept the gift of time to live more completely—to build more, love more, grow more. To finish the chapters life so often leaves unwritten.

Final Thoughts

In the end, Stoicism doesn’t require death to function as a philosophy. If anything, it adapts. Whether you live for a season or a millennium, you are still called to the same ideal: live well. Choose virtue. Accept fate—and, if fate one day includes the option to live longer or forever, meet it with clarity and purpose.

Because Stoicism isn’t about how long you live. It’s about how you live.

---